<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://independentreview.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Litchfield Independent Review - National convention coverage - Comments</title>
 <link>http://independentreview.net/community/forums/federal-government/national-convention-coverage</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;National convention coverage&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>National convention coverage</title>
 <link>http://independentreview.net/community/forums/federal-government/national-convention-coverage</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday marked the start of the Democratic National Convention in Denver, and flipping through my cable channels last night, I noticed almost 1/3 were running live stream from the convention. For the next two weeks, the media coverage will be heavy at both the DNC and the Republican National Convention Sept. 1-4 in Minneapolis-St. Paul. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How closely will you be watching the conventions and listening to the speakers? Will you be glued to the television as the next presidential nominees are endorsed?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://independentreview.net/community/forums/federal-government/national-convention-coverage#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://independentreview.net/community/forums/federal-government">Federal Government</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:30:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kristin Holtz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3545 at http://independentreview.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
